Pemberdayaan Mahasiswa Stok Bina Guna Sebagai Voluntir Pon XXI 2024 Sumatera Utara di Cabang Olahraga Atletik: Sebuah Pengabdian Masyarakat
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.53905/joska.v2si1.2Keywords:
pemberdayaan mahasiswa, voluntir olahraga, PON 2024, atletik, pengabdian masyarakatAbstract
Objectives: Kegiatan pengabdian masyarakat ini bertujuan untuk memberdayakan mahasiswa STOK Bina Guna sebagai voluntir profesional dalam penyelenggaraan PON XXI 2024 Sumatera Utara khususnya di cabang olahraga atletik, sekaligus meningkatkan kompetensi mahasiswa dalam manajemen event olahraga nasional dan mengembangkan soft skills yang relevan dengan dunia kerja.
Methods: Metode pelaksanaan menggunakan pendekatan partisipatif melalui empat tahap yaitu: (1) rekrutmen dan seleksi mahasiswa voluntir, (2) pelatihan intensif meliputi manajemen event, protokol kesehatan olahraga, pertolongan pertama, dan hospitality service, (3) praktik lapangan dan simulasi, serta (4) penugasan aktif selama pelaksanaan PON XXI 2024. Total 60 mahasiswa STOK Bina Guna dari berbagai program studi terlibat dalam program ini selama periode Maret-September 2024.
Results: Program berhasil melatih dan menugaskan 60 mahasiswa sebagai voluntir dengan tingkat kepuasan panitia mencapai 92%. Terjadi peningkatan signifikan pada kompetensi mahasiswa meliputi: kemampuan manajemen event (peningkatan 78%), keterampilan komunikasi (85%), kerja tim (88%), dan pengetahuan protokol olahraga (82%). Mahasiswa berhasil mendukung kelancaran 15 nomor pertandingan atletik dengan zero incident dan mendapat apresiasi dari KONI Sumut.
Conclusion: Program pemberdayaan mahasiswa sebagai voluntir PON XXI 2024 terbukti efektif meningkatkan kompetensi praktis mahasiswa sekaligus mendukung kesuksesan penyelenggaraan event olahraga nasional. Model pemberdayaan ini dapat direplikasi untuk event serupa dengan penyesuaian konteks lokal.
References
Biggs, J., & Tang, C. (2011). Teaching for quality learning at university (4th ed.). McGraw-Hill Education.
Bringle, R. G., & Hatcher, J. A. (2002). Campus–community partnerships: The terms of engagement. Journal of Social Issues, 58(3), 503–
516. https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-4560.00273
Carayannis, E. G., & Campbell, D. F. J. (2012). Mode 3 knowledge production in quadruple helix innovation systems: 21st-century democracy, innovation, and entrepreneurship for development. Springer.
Chalip, L. (2006). Towards social leverage of sport events. Journal of Sport & Tourism, 11(2), 109–127. https://doi.org/10.1080/14775080601155126
Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2018). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications. Cuskelly, G., Hoye, R., & Auld, C. (2006). Working with volunteers in sport: Theory and practice. Routledge.
Etzkowitz, H., & Leydesdorff, L. (2000). The dynamics of innovation: From national systems and “Mode 2” to a triple helix of university– industry–government relations. Research Policy, 29(2), 109–123. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(99)00055-4
Eby, L. T., Allen, T. D., Evans, S. C., Ng, T., & DuBois, D. L. (2013). Does mentoring matter? A multidisciplinary meta-analysis comparing mentored and non-mentored individuals. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 83(1), 106–116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2013.02.004
Gallo, M. L., Carlsen, L., & Ringrose, K. (2020). Volunteering as career capital: The career benefits of volunteering at large-scale sport events. International Journal of Sport Management and Marketing, 20(1–2), 47–64. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJSMM.2020.10031163
Graham, C. R. (2013). Emerging practice and research in blended learning. In M. G. Moore (Ed.), Handbook of distance education (3rd ed., pp. 333–350). Routledge.
Gratton, C., & Preuss, H. (2008). Maximizing Olympic impacts by building up legacies. The International Journal of the History of Sport, 25(14), 1922–1938. https://doi.org/10.1080/09523360802439023
Green, B. C., & Chalip, L. (2004). Paths to volunteer commitment: Lessons from the Sydney Olympic Games. Event Management, 8(1), 9–
20. https://doi.org/10.3727/152599503108751332
Inkson, K., & Arthur, M. B. (2001). How to be a successful career capitalist. Organizational Dynamics, 30(1), 48–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0090-2616(01)00040-7
Kolb, D. A. (2015). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development (2nd ed.). Pearson Education. Kolb, A. Y., & Kolb, D. A. (2017). The experiential educator: Principles and practices of experiential learning. Kaospilot.
Kemenpora. (2023). Rencana strategis Kementerian Pemuda dan Olahraga 2020–2024. Jakarta: Kemenpora RI. KONI Sumut. (2024). Laporan persiapan PON XXI Sumatera Utara. Medan: KONI Sumatera Utara.
Lizzio, A., & Wilson, K. (2004). Action learning in higher education: An investigation of its potential to develop professional capability.
Studies in Higher Education, 29(4), 469–488. https://doi.org/10.1080/0307507042000236371
Misener, K., & Doherty, A. (2012). Connecting the community through sport club partnerships. International Journal of Sport Policy and Politics, 4(2), 243–255. https://doi.org/10.1080/19406940.2012.674963
Moon, J. A. (2013). Reflection and employability: Reflection on learning and reflective practices. Routledge.
Nichols, G., & Ralston, R. (2012). The relationship between sport clubs, volunteers and their communities: A study of the UK. International Journal of Sport Policy and Politics, 4(3), 243–259. https://doi.org/10.1080/19406940.2012.656675
Parent, M. M., & Smith-Swan, S. (2013). Managing major sports events: Theory and practice. Routledge.
Perić, M., Vitezić, V., & Mekinc, J. (2019). Conceptualising innovative business models for sustainable sport tourism. Sustainability, 11(19), 5373. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11195373
Radianti, J., Majchrzak, T. A., Fromm, J., & Wohlgenannt, I. (2020). A systematic review of immersive virtual reality applications for higher education: Design elements, lessons learned, and research agenda. Computers & Education, 147, 103778. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103778
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being.
American Psychologist, 55(1), 68–78. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.68
Salas, E., Tannenbaum, S. I., Kraiger, K., & Smith-Jentsch, K. A. (2012). The science of training and development in organizations: What matters in practice. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 13(2), 74–101. https://doi.org/10.1177/1529100612436661
Tim Pengabdian STOK Bina Guna. (2024). Laporan survei kesiapan voluntir PON XXI Sumut. Medan: STOK Bina Guna.
Topping, K. J. (2005). Trends in peer learning. Educational Psychology, 25(6), 631–645. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410500345172 Watson, D., Hollister, R., Stroud, S., & Babcock, E. (2011). The engaged university: International perspectives on civic engagement.
Routledge.
Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications: Design and methods (6th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Yorke, M. (2006). Employability in higher education: What it is – what it is not. Higher Education Academy Learning and Employability Series, 1, 1–24.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
Categories
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Alan Alfiansyah Putra Karo Karo, Emong Ikhtiar Bernando Gulo, Florus Fakhili Gulo
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
